In re Giamanco

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Giamanco

883 A.2d 350, 185 N.J. 174, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1136

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedOctober 7, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 883 A.2d 350 (In re Giamanco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Giamanco, 883 A.2d 350, 185 N.J. 174, 2005 N.J. LEXIS 1136 (N.J. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-103, concluding that THOMAS A. GIAMAN-CO of RIDGEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be censured for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.7(b) (conflict of interest), RPC 8.4(e) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

[175]*175It is ORDERED that THOMAS A. GIAMANCO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI