In re Gewertz
234 A.D. 619
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 234 A.D. 619 (In re Gewertz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Gewertz, 234 A.D. 619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Order denying motion for peremptory mandamus order affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Davis, J., dissent and vote for reversal. [140 Misc. 743.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gewertz v. Berry
140 Misc. 743 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gewertz-nyappdiv-1931.