In Re Gernert

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

In Re Gernert

1915 OK 568, 153 P. 1164, 53 Okla. 57, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 361

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 27, 1915

Docket6584

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK 568 (In Re Gernert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Gernert, 1915 OK 568, 153 P. 1164, 53 Okla. 57, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 361 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding, commenced in this court by T. F. Home to disbar James H. Gernert, pursuant to Rev. Laws 1910, see. 253. On March 3, 1915, pursuant to an order of this court, the cause was referred to Hon. Chas. H. Cook, to take testimony and report thereon his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which, upon issue joined, he afterwards did, and recommended that the charges against said Gernert be dismissed. We, in the meantime, required said Gernert and Horne to deposit each $25 to cover costs, which they did, and thereafter Horne was further required to make an additional deposit of $5 with the clerk of this court for the same purpose.

The exceptions to the report of the referee are overruled, and the charges against Gernert dismissed; and on motion of sáid Gernert and pursuant to Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 5231, the costs of this proceeding are taxed to said Horne.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding, commenced in this court by T. F. Home to disbar James H. Gernert, pursuant to Rev. Laws 1910, see. 253. On March 3, 1915, pursuant to an order of this court, the cause was referred to Hon. Chas. H. Cook, to take testimony and report thereon his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which, upon issue joined, he afterwards did, and recommended that the charges against said Gernert be dismissed. We, in the meantime, required said Gernert and Horne to deposit each $25 to cover costs, which they did, and thereafter Horne was further required to make an additional deposit of $5 with the clerk of this court for the same purpose.

The exceptions to the report of the referee are overruled, and the charges against Gernert dismissed; and on motion of sáid Gernert and pursuant to Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 5231, the costs of this proceeding are taxed to said Horne.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 568, 153 P. 1164, 53 Okla. 57, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gernert-okla-1915.