In Re Gerideau

960 A.2d 625, 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 447, 2008 WL 4998344
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 26, 2008
Docket08-BG-1163
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 960 A.2d 625 (In Re Gerideau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Gerideau, 960 A.2d 625, 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 447, 2008 WL 4998344 (D.C. 2008).

Opinion

*626 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the certified order of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, see Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gerideau, No. 1355 Disc. Docket No. 3 (Pa. May 23, 2008), this court’s September 30, 2008, order suspending respondent from the practice of law pending further action of the court and directing her to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Lisa C. Gerideau is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as she files an affidavit that fully complies with the requirements of D.CJBar. R. XI, § 14(g).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Beggin
967 A.2d 180 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
960 A.2d 625, 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 447, 2008 WL 4998344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gerideau-dc-2008.