In re Gerhardt

64 So. 3d 203, 2011 La. LEXIS 952, 2011 WL 1600522

• Court: Supreme Court of Louisiana
• Decided: April 29, 2011
• Docket: No. 2011-B-0687
• Status: Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*

LThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected two legal matters and failed to communicate with two clients. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Walter W. Gerhardt, Louisiana Bar Roll number 20827, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year and one day. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent’s successful completion of a two-year period of supervised probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.