in Re Gerard Gabel

Opinion

Opinion issued February 9, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

2

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that is only available in limited circumstances. See Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992). To be entitled to mandamus relief, the relator must show both that the trial court abused its discretion and that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004).

Because temporary orders in a suit to modify the parent-child relationship are not appealable, a petition for writ of mandamus is an appropriate means to challenge such orders. See In re Herring, 221 S.W.3d 729, 730 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2007, orig. proceeding). However, relator has failed to meet his burden to establish an abuse of discretion of the trial court. See Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 840 (abuse of discretion exists where trial court “reaches a decision so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount to a clear and prejudicial error of law”).

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Farris.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-20-00815-CV ——————————— IN RE GERARD THOMAS GABEL, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Gerard Thomas Gabel, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, asserting that the trial court abused its discretion in entering temporary orders in a suit to modify the parent-child relationship brought against him by real party in interest, Tracey Gabel Koehne.1 1 The underlying case is Tracey Gabel Koehne v. Gerard Thomas Gabel, Cause No. 2010-74676, in the 312th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Clinton E. Wells, Jr. presiding.