in Re: Gerard Burks
This text of in Re: Gerard Burks (in Re: Gerard Burks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00336-CV
IN RE GERALD BURKS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On April 5, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relator seeks to overturn (1) respondent=s denial of a default judgment on appearance day and (2) refusal to permit evidence of relator=s attorney=s fees.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus will not issue for the purpose of directing a trial court to render a judgment by default. See In re Ramirez, 994 S.W.2d 682, 683 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding). Additionally, the record does not reflect a ruling on relator=s offer of evidence. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 22, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Seymore, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Gerard Burks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gerard-burks-texapp-2005.