in Re Gerald J. Durden
This text of in Re Gerald J. Durden (in Re Gerald J. Durden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 14, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-11-00459-CR
IN RE GERALD J. DURDEN, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
248th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court No. 905,464
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 24, 2011, Relator, Gerald J. Durden, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Relator requests we compel the District Clerk of Harris County, Texas, Chris Daniel, to “send communicated copies of documents filed in his office to relator . . .”
This Court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals’ district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals' jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004). Because the petition for writ of mandamus is directed toward a district clerk and is not necessary to enforce this court’s jurisdiction, we have no jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b)(1).
Accordingly, the petitions for writ of mandamus are ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Brown, and Christopher.
Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Gerald J. Durden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gerald-j-durden-texapp-2011.