In Re: George W. Gantt

59 F.3d 166, 1995 WL 378591
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 27, 1995·No. 94-7384·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

59 F.3d 166
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

In Re: George W. GANTT, Petitioner--Appellant.

No. 94-7384.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 31, 1995.
Decided: June 27, 1995.

George W. Gantt, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's miscellaneous order directing him not to file documents with the court that contain threats, obscenities, or excrement. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In re: George W. Gantt, No. MISC-94-82 (D. Md. Nov. 2, 1994). See Fed.R.Civ.P. 83; Strickler v. Waters, 989 F.2d 1375, 1384 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 62 U.S.L.W. 3319 (U.S.1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: George W. Gantt, 59 F.3d 166, 1995 WL 378591 (4th Cir. 1995).

59 F.3d 166 (In Re: George W. Gantt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gantt v. MD Division of Correction
894 F. Supp. 226 (D. Maryland, 1995)