in Re George Rosas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 24, 2015
No. 04-15-00086-CR
IN RE George ROSAS
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
On February 19, 2015, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus and for writ of habeas corpus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider some of the relief requested. Relator’s petition is accordingly DISMISSED IN PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. With respect to relator’s remaining claims, the court has determined that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the remaining claims for relief in relator’s petition for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on February 24, 2015.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: ____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CR5767, styled The State of Texas v. George Rosas, pending in the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re George Rosas (in Re George Rosas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.