in Re: George R. Neely
This text of in Re: George R. Neely (in Re: George R. Neely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed April 24, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00430-CV
IN RE GEORGE R. NEELY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On April 17, 2003, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, relator seeks to compel the Hon. Levi Benton, presiding judge of the 215th District Court of Harris County, to set aside his order granting a new trial and enter judgment on the jury's verdict in cause number 94-012606, styled George Neely and Law Offices of George R. Neely, P.C. v. Nancy Lynn Birran and Dale Birran.
We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Opinion filed April 24, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: George R. Neely, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-george-r-neely-texapp-2003.