In re George

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re George

810 A.2d 60, 174 N.J. 538, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1620

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 26, 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB-02-189, concluding that JACKIE S. GEORGE of CLIFFSIDE PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a)(5) (lack of candor toward a tribunal), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JACKIE S. GEORGE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB-02-189, concluding that JACKIE S. GEORGE of CLIFFSIDE PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a)(5) (lack of candor toward a tribunal), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JACKIE S. GEORGE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re George, 810 A.2d 60, 174 N.J. 538, 2002 N.J. LEXIS 1620 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

810 A.2d 60 (In re George) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.