In re George

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re George

608 A.2d 341, 128 N.J. 545, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1444

DecidedJuly 13, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 608 A.2d 341 (In re George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re George, 608 A.2d 341, 128 N.J. 545, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1444 (N.J. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court recommending that JOHN GEORGE of SOUTH PLAIN-FIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1953 and who was thereafter suspended from practice for a period of one year, effective October 9, 1989, and who remains suspended at this time, be publicly reprimanded for misrepresenting the status of a lawsuit to clients, in violation of RPC 8.4(c), and for failing to cooperate with the ethics authorities, in violation of RPC 8.1, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and JOHN GEORGE is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court recommending that JOHN GEORGE of SOUTH PLAIN-FIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1953 and who was thereafter suspended from practice for a period of one year, effective October 9, 1989, and who remains suspended at this time, be publicly reprimanded for misrepresenting the status of a lawsuit to clients, in violation of RPC 8.4(c), and for failing to cooperate with the ethics authorities, in violation of RPC 8.1, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review are adopted and JOHN GEORGE is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

608 A.2d 341, 128 N.J. 545, 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-george-nj-1992.