In Re George

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In Re George

62 So. 3d 61, 2011 La. LEXIS 1273, 2011 WL 2083954

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 27, 2011

Docket2011-B-0848

StatusPublished

This text of 62 So. 3d 61 (In Re George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re George, 62 So. 3d 61, 2011 La. LEXIS 1273, 2011 WL 2083954 (La. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation and knowingly disobeyed an obligation under the rules of a tribunal. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Benny George, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 6015, be publicly reprimanded. It is further ordered that respondent attend and successfully complete the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Ethics School.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty *62 days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

*

Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM. *

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent failed to make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation and knowingly disobeyed an obligation under the rules of a tribunal. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Benny George, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 6015, be publicly reprimanded. It is further ordered that respondent attend and successfully complete the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Ethics School.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty *62 days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

*

Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 So. 3d 61, 2011 La. LEXIS 1273, 2011 WL 2083954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-george-la-2011.