in Re George Jones
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00114-CR ____________________
IN RE GEORGE JONES
_______________________________________________________ ______________
Original Proceeding ________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A petition for writ of mandamus filed by George Jones seeks to compel the
judge of the 410th District Court of Montgomery County to add five days of pre-
sentence jail time credit for time Jones spent in jail from October 8, 2003 to
October 13, 2003. See Ex parte Florence, 319 S.W.3d 695, 696 (Tex. Crim. App.
2010). The State’s response to the petition includes a judgment nunc pro tunc that
adds five additional days to the jail time credit listed in the original judgment. The
judgment nunc pro tunc was signed before the relator filed his petition for writ of
1 mandamus. 1 Because the relator has not shown that he has been denied pre-
sentence jail time credit, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See In re
Brown, 343 S.W.3d 803, 804-05 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011) (mandamus relief is
available only if the right to additional pre-trial jail time credit is absolutely
indisputable).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 24, 2014 Opinion Delivered April 9, 2014 Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
1 The mandamus record does not show whether the relator was notified that the judgment nunc pro tunc had been signed. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re George Jones (in Re George Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.