In re George
This text of 55 F. App'x 173 (In re George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cyrus Jonathan George petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to alter or amend the judgment in his criminal case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 F. App'x 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-george-ca4-2003.