In re: Gentry
This text of In re: Gentry (In re: Gentry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2248
In Re: PIERRE GENTRY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:07-cr-00294-HFF-9)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pierre Gentry, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Pierre Gentry petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
motion for a new trial. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court recently entered
a decision in the underlying action. Accordingly, because the
district court has recently decided Gentry’s case, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Gentry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gentry-ca4-2011.