In re Genesis S.

70 A.D.3d 570, 895 N.Y.S.2d 85
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 23, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 70 A.D.3d 570 (In re Genesis S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Genesis S., 70 A.D.3d 570, 895 N.Y.S.2d 85 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about December 4, 2008, which, after a fact-finding hearing, terminated respondent mother’s parental rights to the subject children and committed their custody and guardianship to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding that respondent’s mental illness left her unable to properly and adequately care for the children presently and for the foreseeable future was supported by clear and convincing evidence (Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; see Matter of Ayodele Ademoli J., 45 AD3d 686 [2007]). Medical records and unrebutted testimony by an expert psychiatrist provided detailed evidence to support the conclusion that respondent had a long mental health history, including diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, rendering her unable to act in accordance with the children’s needs (see Matter of Shawndalaya II., 46 AD3d 1172 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 703 [2008]; Matter of Nadaniel Jackie P., 35 AD3d 305 [2006]).

Respondent’s claim, raised for the first time on appeal, that no proof was adduced that her “mental retardation” originated during her developmental period, as defined in Social Services Law § 384-b (6) (b), is unpreserved (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 145 [1984]). In any event, we note that the agency proceeded only on a “mental illness” cause of action (§ 384-b [6] [a]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Edward E. M. (Edward M.)
202 N.Y.S.3d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of J.C. (Joycelyn L.)
201 N.Y.S.3d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Matter of Madison Mia B. (Katherine Janet B.)
2018 NY Slip Op 4639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
In re Bridget W.
112 A.D.3d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re Jeremiah M.
109 A.D.3d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re Faith D.A.
99 A.D.3d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Sharon Crystal F.
89 A.D.3d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
B., ROYFIK, MTR. OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
In re Royfik B.
89 A.D.3d 1423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Jamiah Sharang C.
85 A.D.3d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Roberto A.
73 A.D.3d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A.D.3d 570, 895 N.Y.S.2d 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-genesis-s-nyappdiv-2010.