In Re: General Statewide Judicial Emergency

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 28, 2020·No. 531 Judicial Administration 2020·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: GENERAL STATEWIDE : Nos. 531 and 532 Judicial JUDICIAL EMERGENCY : Administration Docket :

EMERGENCY ORDER OF STATEWIDE JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION APPLICABLE FROM MAY 1, 2020, THROUGH JUNE 1, 2020

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2020, pursuant to Rule of Judicial Administration 1952(A) and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s constitutionally- conferred general supervisory and administrative authority over all courts and magisterial district judges, see PA. CONST. art. V, §10(a), this Court DIRECTS that the general, statewide judicial emergency declared in this Court’s Order of March 16, 2020, IS EXTENDED through June 1, 2020.

From the time of the Court’s Order of March 16, 2020, Pennsylvania’s courts have remained operational, albeit with significant limitations due to the current pandemic, including restricted public access to court facilities. Beginning May 4, 2020, unless otherwise provided by a local emergency order, Pennsylvania courts generally SHALL BE OPEN to conduct all court business. However, all IN-PERSON ACCESS AND PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE STRICTLY LIMITED according to the terms of this Order or a more restrictive order issued by a local court under its authorized emergency powers.

The courts’ priorities SHALL REMAIN CENTERED on their critical functions;1 however, courts SHALL PUT FORWARD THEIR BEST EFFORTS to accomplish the timely administration of justice in all other matters, subject to the constraints and safety considerations set forth below.

This Order prospectively replaces the Second Supplemental Order of April 1, 2020, issued at the above dockets, which SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT until that Order expires on its own terms. The explanatory background information set forth in that Order, as well as the Order of March 18, 2020, is incorporated here by reference.

The Court further explains and DIRECTS as follows:

I. Background

Per the request of the Commonwealth’s Secretary of Health, Pennsylvania courts have been generally closed to the public for over one month, subject to a series of general and specific directives and exceptions centered on the continuous performance of the courts’ most critical functions. The Secretary’s concern -- shared by all Justices of this Court -- is with safeguarding the health and safety of court personnel, court users, and members of the public in light of the risks posed by the COVID-19 virus. In view of the ongoing public health crisis, this Court finds that a further extension of the statewide judicial emergency is necessary.

1 As reflected below, the present Order employs the term “critical functions” to include the tasks referred to in prior orders as “essential” ones. This approach recognizes that - - since the prevailing circumstances have required several extensions of this Court’s emergency declaration -- it has now become incumbent upon the courts to undertake a broader range of functions to assure the proper administration of justice.

Some local courts have utilized the procedures specified in Rule of Judicial Administration 1952 and/or this Court’s prior orders to declare local emergencies. Such local emergencies REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT, empowering President Judges in those districts to continue to exercise emergency powers under Rule 1952(B)(2). Extant local emergency orders and directives, including any provisions of these affecting time calculations or deadlines, SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT until they expire or are rescinded locally.

Should other President Judges deem it prudent to exercise emergency powers above and beyond the authority and latitude provided in this Order, they may file a declaration of an emergency in their districts with the Supreme Court Prothonotary in the Eastern, Western, or Middle District Office, as appropriate for the particular local judicial district. Such a declaration generally SHALL BE SELF-EFFECTUATING subject to any subsequent order by this Court or the local court, with the understanding that the temporary suspension or modification of any statewide court rules other than those addressed in this Order shall first require an application to this Court pursuant to Rule of Judicial Administration 1952(B)(2)(m).

In the jurisdictions with prevailing local emergencies, self-effectuating extensions may be filed. However, any declaration extending a local emergency beyond June 1, 2020, should provide supporting reasoning.2

2 If a docket number has been assigned to the judicial district for emergency purposes, any further order concerning administrative directives or other matters associated with the local judicial emergency should be captioned so as to indicate that docket number. For convenience, declarations of emergency and associated local orders may be transmitted via electronic mail to: Irene.Bizzoso@pacourts.us.

II. The Safety of Judges, Court Staff, Court Users, and Others To the extent they are not already in place, all court leaders MUST IMPLEMENT AND MAINTAIN procedures that restrict potential COVID-19 exposure which could result from interactions of judges, court staff, and county agency staff among themselves and with or among members of the public present at court facilities. Among other measures, President Judges may restrict access to court facilities so that appropriate social distancing can be maintained. To the degree practicable in light of the necessity for some in-person appearances and proceedings, safety measures should be employed that are as consistent as possible with the federal and state executive guidance associated with countering the spread of the COVID-19 virus. To the extent that hearings and conferences can be held in the presence of counsel only, the courts SHALL PERMIT the parties’ physical presence to be excused. In all events, any necessary in-person proceedings SHALL BE HELD in courtrooms designated by the individual courts of common pleas to minimize person-to-person contact.

Consistent with the previous guidance, and subject to the direction of President Judges, all courts -- including magisterial district courts -- are encouraged to consider deciding matters on the papers and/or to conduct court proceedings through the use of advanced communication technologies,3 to the extent that constitutional requirements

3 Advanced communication technology includes, but is not limited to: systems providing for two-way simultaneous communication of image and sound; closed-circuit television; telephone and facsimile equipment; and electronic mail. See Pa.R.J.A. No. 1952(A)(2)(e) & comment (citing Rule of Criminal Procedure 103 for the definition of advanced communication technology).

can be satisfied. Any state or local rule that impedes a judge’s ability to utilize available technologies to limit in-person contact is suspended through June 1, 2020.

The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts stands ready to provide guidance to courts concerning local implementation of technological resources. In the absence of a certification as provided in Part III of this Order, no proceeding should be delayed solely on account of the present public health crisis that could reasonably be conducted using available advanced communication technologies in a manner that is consistent with constitutional requirements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: General Statewide Judicial Emergency, (Pa. 2020).

In Re: General Statewide Judicial Emergency (In Re: General Statewide Judicial Emergency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related