In Re Gene Rosen

198 A.3d 192
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 2018·No. 18-BG-1026·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of Florida disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction; this court's October 5, 2018, order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit on November 16, 2018, but that he failed to file a response to this court's order to show cause, it is

ORDERED that Gene S. Rosen is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, nunc pro tunc to November 16, 2018. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194 , 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Gene Rosen, 198 A.3d 192 (D.C. 2018).

198 A.3d 192 (In Re Gene Rosen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Sibley
990 A.2d 483 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2010)
In Re Fuller
930 A.2d 194 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2007)