In re Gembarosky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Gembarosky

671 A.2d 223

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 5, 1996

DocketNo. 166 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; Board File No. C1-95-1062

StatusPublished

This text of 671 A.2d 223 (In re Gembarosky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gembarosky, 671 A.2d 223 (Pa. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 1996, James G. Gembarosky having been disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New York by Order of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, entered September 29, 1995; the said James G. Gemba-rosky having been directed on November 20, 1995, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that James G. Gembarosky is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 1996, James G. Gembarosky having been disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New York by Order of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department, entered September 29, 1995; the said James G. Gemba-rosky having been directed on November 20, 1995, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that James G. Gembarosky is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

671 A.2d 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gembarosky-pa-1996.