In re Gelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Gelman

81 A.D.2d 873, 441 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11570

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 13, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 A.D.2d 873 (In re Gelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gelman, 81 A.D.2d 873, 441 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to discipline respondent, an attorney and counselor at law, for professional misconduct, the issues raised by the petition and the answer are referred to J. Mitchell Rosenberg, Esq., of 901 Avenue H, Brooklyn, New York, 11230, as Special Referee, to hear and to report, with his findings upon each of the issues. In view of the large number and gravity of the charges against the respondent, this court in the public interest, on its own motion, temporarily suspends the respondent from the practice of law forthwith, pending the report of the Referee and the further order of this court. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone, Lazer and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to discipline respondent, an attorney and counselor at law, for professional misconduct, the issues raised by the petition and the answer are referred to J. Mitchell Rosenberg, Esq., of 901 Avenue H, Brooklyn, New York, 11230, as Special Referee, to hear and to report, with his findings upon each of the issues. In view of the large number and gravity of the charges against the respondent, this court in the public interest, on its own motion, temporarily suspends the respondent from the practice of law forthwith, pending the report of the Referee and the further order of this court. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone, Lazer and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 873, 441 N.Y.S.2d 413, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gelman-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack