In re Gellene

246 A.D.2d 109, 676 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8673
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 30, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 246 A.D.2d 109 (In re Gellene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gellene, 246 A.D.2d 109, 676 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent John G. Gellene was admitted to the practice of [110]*110law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on March 26, 1990. On March 3, 1998, he was convicted, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, of two counts of bankruptcy fraud (18 USC § 152) and one count of false sworn declaration (18 USC § 1623), both of which are felonies under the United States Code.

By petition dated May 1, 1998, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), which provides for automatic disbarment where an attorney has been convicted of a felony in this State or elsewhere, so long as the underlying conduct constitutes a felony in this State. Respondent’s convictions for bankruptcy fraud and false sworn declaration are similar, respectively, to the crimes of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony under Penal Law § 175.35 (see, Matter of Knoll, 181 AD2d 136), and perjury in the first degree, a class D felony under Penal Law § 210.15 (see, Matter of DeSalvo, 189 AD2d 322). On the basis of his convictions, respondent consents to the petition.

Accordingly, the petition to strike respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys in this State is granted, and respondent’s name is so stricken, effective immediately.

Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Nardelli, Wallach and Saxe, JJ., concur.

Petition granted, and respondent’s name directed to be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective July 30, 1998.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Kelley
2025 NY Slip Op 05735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Matter of Bardey
133 A.D.3d 77 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
In re Yagman
61 A.D.3d 30 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Freedman
11 A.D.3d 172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re McSherry
275 A.D.2d 103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D.2d 109, 676 N.Y.S.2d 161, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gellene-nyappdiv-1998.