in Re Geico Insurance Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 17, 2015
Docket14-15-00746-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Geico Insurance Company (in Re Geico Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Geico Insurance Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Order filed September 17, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-15-00746-CV ____________

IN RE GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-50259-A

ORDER

On September 3, 2015, relator GEICO Insurance Company, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable Robert Schaffer, Judge of the 152nd District Court, in Harris County, Texas, to set aside his order dated November 17, 2014 lifting the abatement of Linda Holman’s extra-contractual claims, entered in trial court number 2013-50259-A, styled Linda Holman v. GEICO Insurance Company. Relator claims respondent abused his discretion by lifting the abatement, urging that Holman’s extra-contractual claims are not ripe until Holman’s breach of contract claim against GEICO is adjudicated.

However, the order of severance signed on June 5, 2014, which severed the extra-contractual claims, did not expressly sever plaintiff Linda Holman’s breach of contract claim against GEICO, and that breach of contract claim appears to have remained as part of cause number 2013-50259. On September 10, 2014, the trial court signed a judgment that states, among other things, “This judgment finally disposes of all parties and all claims and is appealable.” Moreover, this judgment does not award plaintiff any relief against GEICO.

We request that both GEICO and Linda Holman, on or before September 30, 2015, file letter briefs addressing the issue of (a) whether the judgment signed on September 10, 2014 is a final judgment under Lehmann v. Har-Con Corporation, 39 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. 2001), and, if so, (b) whether that judgment adjudicated Holman’s breach of contract claim against GEICO.

The court also extends the time for the filing of Holman’s response to the petition for writ of mandamus until September 30, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Geico Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-geico-insurance-company-texapp-2015.