In Re Gee

148 P. 1146, 11 Okla. Crim. 706
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 1, 1900
DocketNo. A-1704.
StatusPublished

This text of 148 P. 1146 (In Re Gee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Gee, 148 P. 1146, 11 Okla. Crim. 706 (Okla. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

PEE CTJEIAM.

The petition filed on behalf of said Bird Gee, alleges in substance that he is illegally restrained of his liberty by Jack Spain, sheriff of Oklahoma county, and that ho is held in custody by virtue of a certain commitment issued on the preliminary examination by Sam Bartell, a justice of the peace in and for Oklahoma county, upon the cijhrge ,of perjury; that there was no testimony to show that defendant committed an offense as charged, and said commitment was issued without authority of law and was wholly void, in that there was no legal evidence adduced to prove or tending to prove in any manner that there is probable cause to believe the defendant to be guilty of the crime of perjury, which it is alleged will more fully appear from the transcript of the testimony taken upon said examination, which is annexed to and made a part of said petition. Upon the consideration of all the evidence presented in support of the application we are of opinion that it is sufficient to sustain the commitment. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged that the writ be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 P. 1146, 11 Okla. Crim. 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gee-oklacrimapp-1900.