in Re: GECU

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 15, 2011
Docket08-11-00139-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: GECU (in Re: GECU) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: GECU, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§

§ IN RE: GECU, No. 08-11-00139-CV § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Relator. § IN MANDAMUS §

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator, GECU, asks this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against the Honorable

Linda Y. Chew, Judge of the 327th District Court of El Paso County. To be entitled to mandamus

relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the relator must show that the trial court clearly

abused its discretion. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second,

the relator must demonstrate that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 136. Based on the

record before us, we conclude that Relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the

petition is denied. See TEX .R.APP .P. 52.8(a).

June 15, 2011 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ. Chew, C.J., not participating

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: GECU, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gecu-texapp-2011.