In Re Gavin Wilbur West v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 27, 2025·No. 01-25-00117-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 27, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Although relator has not included the required identity of parties, see TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.3(a), his petition indicates that his complaints concern the lack of action by the Honorable Felishia Young, Associate Judge of the 328th District Court. Although relator mentions the Honorable Monica Rawlins, the Presiding Judge of the 328th District Court,2 he presents no argument seeking relief concerning any actions by Judge Rawlins. The appellate court lacks mandamus jurisdiction over an associate judge. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8. Because this Court lacks jurisdiction, we need not reach any other issues raised in the petition. Any pending motions are likewise dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Johnson, and Dokupil.

2 Relator states: “Judge Rowlings [sic] handling of the De Novo, has been equally inappropriate, but was likely caused by Judge Young’s failure to record her rulings/decisions, refusal to hear Motions, and refusal to set Hearings, thus creating of a “legal limbo” designed to punish the Respondent.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Gavin Wilbur West v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re Gavin Wilbur West v. the State of Texas (In Re Gavin Wilbur West v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.