in Re gates/gomez/rodriguez/ferguson Minors
This text of in Re gates/gomez/rodriguez/ferguson Minors (in Re gates/gomez/rodriguez/ferguson Minors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
December 11, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem 162064 Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein In re GATES/GOMEZ/RODRIGUEZ/ Elizabeth T. Clement FERGUSON, Minors. SC: 162064 Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices COA: 352446 Midland CC Family Division: 15-004504-NA
_______________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. December 11, 2020 s1208 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re gates/gomez/rodriguez/ferguson Minors, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gatesgomezrodriguezferguson-minors-mich-2020.