In re Gasper

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Gasper

792 A.2d 595, 568 Pa. 89, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 538

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 5, 2002

DocketNo. 715, Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 792 A.2d 595 (In re Gasper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gasper, 792 A.2d 595, 568 Pa. 89, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 538 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of March, 2002, William C. Gasper, Jr., having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of six months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated July 12, 2001, and disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated October 2, 2001; the said William C. Gasper, Jr., having been directed on December 13, 2001, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

[90]*90ORDERED that William C. Gasper, Jr., is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions .of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of March, 2002, William C. Gasper, Jr., having been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey for a period of six months by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated July 12, 2001, and disbarred from the practice of law in the State of New Jersey by Order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated October 2, 2001; the said William C. Gasper, Jr., having been directed on December 13, 2001, to inform this Court of any claim he has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

[90]*90ORDERED that William C. Gasper, Jr., is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions .of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

792 A.2d 595, 568 Pa. 89, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gasper-pa-2002.