In re Gasper

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Gasper

691 A.2d 817, 149 N.J. 20, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 130

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 25, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 691 A.2d 817 (In re Gasper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gasper, 691 A.2d 817, 149 N.J. 20, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 130 (N.J. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on January 13, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that WILLIAM C. GASPER, JR., of WHITING, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) and (b) (gross neglect and pattern of neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed or to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make an informed decision); and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM C. GASPER, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on January 13, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that WILLIAM C. GASPER, JR., of WHITING, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) and (b) (gross neglect and pattern of neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4(a) and (b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed or to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary to permit the client to make an informed decision); and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM C. GASPER, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

691 A.2d 817, 149 N.J. 20, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gasper-nj-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack