In Re: Gary Sinise Foundation v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: Gary Sinise Foundation v. the State of Texas (In Re: Gary Sinise Foundation v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed August 31, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00633-CV
IN RE GARY SINISE FOUNDATION, Relator
Original Proceeding from the Collin County Probate Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PB1-0352-2022
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Smith, and Kennedy Opinion by Justice Reichek Before the Court is relator’s June 28, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus
wherein relator contends the trial court has refused to rule on a motion to compel
arbitration.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In
re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing relator’s petition, real party in interest’s response,
relator’s reply, and the record properly before us, we conclude that relator has failed
to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Amanda L. Reichek/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
230633F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Gary Sinise Foundation v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gary-sinise-foundation-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.