In re Gary J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Gary J.

217 A.D.2d 627, 629 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 17, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 627 (In re Gary J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gary J., 217 A.D.2d 627, 629 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Segal, J.), dated December 1, 1993, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The respondent initially appeared in this proceeding on October 8, 1993, and the matter was adjourned to November 3, 1993. On that date, the respondent failed to appear, a warrant was issued, and the matter was adjourned to December 1,1993, for a warrant report. When none of the parties appeared on December 1,1993, the Family Court dismissed the petition. On December 15, 1993, the presentment agency moved, inter alia, to restore the matter to the calendar. The Family Court properly denied the presentment agency’s motion (see, Matter of Randy K., 77 NY2d 398). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Segal, J.), dated December 1, 1993, which dismissed the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The respondent initially appeared in this proceeding on October 8, 1993, and the matter was adjourned to November 3, 1993. On that date, the respondent failed to appear, a warrant was issued, and the matter was adjourned to December 1,1993, for a warrant report. When none of the parties appeared on December 1,1993, the Family Court dismissed the petition. On December 15, 1993, the presentment agency moved, inter alia, to restore the matter to the calendar. The Family Court properly denied the presentment agency’s motion (see, Matter of Randy K., 77 NY2d 398). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 627, 629 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gary-j-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack