In re Garvin
This text of 3 Colo. 67 (In re Garvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition sets forth that petitioner has been committed to the common jail of Arapahoe county on a charge of grand larceny. He says he is not guilty of any larceny at all.
The petition does not 'state the evidence adduced before the committing magistrate.
The presumption is that the’ justice acted properly upon the evidence submitted, until the contrary appears.
A petition for habeas corpus should set forth the evidence before the examining officer, so that the court may act advisedly before the writ is granted. Ex parte Klepper, 26 Ill. 532.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Colo. 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-garvin-colo-1876.