In re Garshofsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Garshofsky

46 A.D.2d 632, 360 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3891

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 632 (In re Garshofsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Garshofsky, 46 A.D.2d 632, 360 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 5, 1973, inter alia, appointing a conservator of the property of Sarah Levine, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the fee awarded to petitioner’s counsel and the guardian ad litem to $3,500 and $2,000, respectively, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The order of said court, entered January 11, 1974, denying appellant’s motion for a rehearing, is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record before us does not substantiate the granting of allowances (which are also deemed to include all services rendered on this appeal) in excess of the amounts above set forth. Concur — Nunez, J. P., Murphy, Steuer, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 5, 1973, inter alia, appointing a conservator of the property of Sarah Levine, unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of reducing the fee awarded to petitioner’s counsel and the guardian ad litem to $3,500 and $2,000, respectively, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The order of said court, entered January 11, 1974, denying appellant’s motion for a rehearing, is unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The record before us does not substantiate the granting of allowances (which are also deemed to include all services rendered on this appeal) in excess of the amounts above set forth. Concur — Nunez, J. P., Murphy, Steuer, Tilzer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 632, 360 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-garshofsky-nyappdiv-1974.