In re Garrity
This text of 136 So. 3d 793 (In re Garrity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent commingled earned fees with client funds in his trust account and failed to provide a reasonable periodic accounting to a client. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Robert T. Garrity, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 5951, be suspended from the prae-tice of law for a period of six months. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent’s successful completion of a one-year period of supervised probation governed by the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 So. 3d 793, 2014 WL 1343272, 2014 La. LEXIS 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-garrity-la-2014.