in Re Garner, Lovell, & Stein, P.C., Robert E. Garner, and John H. Lovell
This text of in Re Garner, Lovell, & Stein, P.C., Robert E. Garner, and John H. Lovell (in Re Garner, Lovell, & Stein, P.C., Robert E. Garner, and John H. Lovell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-01-0221-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
JUNE 18, 2001
_______________________________
IN RE: GARNER, LOVELL & STEIN, P.C.,
ROBERT E. GARNER, AND JOHN H. LOVELL
_________________________________
Before BOYD, C.J., and QUINN and JOHNSON, JJ.
On June 12, 2001, the relators filed an unopposed Motion for Dismissal averring that the Petition for Mandamus should be dismissed.
Without passing on the merits of the case, the relators’ unopposed Motion for Dismissal is granted and the Petition for Mandamus is hereby dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). All costs are assessed to the parties incurring the same. Having dismissed the Petition for Mandamus at relators’ request and the real party in interest not being opposed to such a request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Phil Johnson
Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Garner, Lovell, & Stein, P.C., Robert E. Garner, and John H. Lovell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-garner-lovell-stein-pc-robert-e-garner-and-j-texapp-2001.