in Re Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and Georgia-Pacific Corporation
This text of in Re Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and Georgia-Pacific Corporation (in Re Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and Georgia-Pacific Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 19, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00467-CV
IN RE GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC AND
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 24, 2006, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators asked this court to compel the Honorable Mark Davidson, presiding judge of the 11th Judicial District Court of Harris County, to set aside his June 30, 2005 ruling and May 5, 2006 order denying relators= motions to exclude evidence.
Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. We accordingly deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed September 19, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Hudson, and Seymore.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-garlock-sealing-technologies-llc-and-georgia-texapp-2006.