in Re Garland Wayne Scroggins
This text of in Re Garland Wayne Scroggins (in Re Garland Wayne Scroggins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-20-00459-CV
In re Garland Wayne Scroggins
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Garland Wayne Scroggins filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus.
However, he failed to provide a record demonstrating his entitlement to mandamus relief. See
Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (requiring appendix to mandamus petition to contain “a certified
or sworn copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter
complained of”); In re Blakeney, 254 S.W.3d 659, 661-62 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, orig.
proceeding); In re Villarreal, 96 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2003, orig.
proceeding). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P.
52.8(a).
__________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly
Filed: October 6, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Garland Wayne Scroggins, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-garland-wayne-scroggins-texapp-2020.