in Re: Garen Keith Wyatt

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 30, 2019·No. 05-19-00814-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed August 30, 2019

S Court of Appeals In The

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00814-CV

IN RE GAREN KEITH WYATT, Relator

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-00019

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Bridges Before the Court is relators’ July 9, 2019 petition for writ of mandamus in which relator

contends the trial court abused its discretion by denying a motion for protection seeking to

compensate a non-party expert for trial testimony. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must

show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate

appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.

proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the mandamus record, we conclude relator has failed

to show he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)

(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief

sought).

/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

190814F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Garen Keith Wyatt, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in Re: Garen Keith Wyatt (in Re: Garen Keith Wyatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)