In re Gardner

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Gardner

467 S.E.2d 897, 266 Ga. 230, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 514, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 73

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 12, 1996

DocketS95Y1380

StatusPublished

This text of 467 S.E.2d 897 (In re Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gardner, 467 S.E.2d 897, 266 Ga. 230, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 514, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 73 (Ga. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

On June 26, 1995, this Court accepted William W. Gardner’s petition for voluntary discipline, suspending him from the practice of law in this state for six months with conditions for reinstatement. In the Matter of William W. Gardner, 265 Ga. 482 (458 SE2d 355) (1995). Gardner has certified to this Court that he has complied with all requirements for his reinstatement. The State Bar has acknowledged such compliance and has no objection to Gardner’s reinstate[231]*231ment to the practice of law in Georgia. It appearing that Gardner has completed six months suspension and has satisfied all conditions imposed by this Court, we agree with the State Bar that Gardner’s suspension should be lifted. Accordingly, the June 26, 1995, suspension imposed by this Court is hereby lifted.

Decided February 12, 1996. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Marie L. McCarthy, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. Beltran & Bills, Frank J. Beltran, Ralph Perales, for Gardner.

Reinstated.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

On June 26, 1995, this Court accepted William W. Gardner’s petition for voluntary discipline, suspending him from the practice of law in this state for six months with conditions for reinstatement. In the Matter of William W. Gardner, 265 Ga. 482 (458 SE2d 355) (1995). Gardner has certified to this Court that he has complied with all requirements for his reinstatement. The State Bar has acknowledged such compliance and has no objection to Gardner’s reinstate[231]*231ment to the practice of law in Georgia. It appearing that Gardner has completed six months suspension and has satisfied all conditions imposed by this Court, we agree with the State Bar that Gardner’s suspension should be lifted. Accordingly, the June 26, 1995, suspension imposed by this Court is hereby lifted.

Decided February 12, 1996. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Marie L. McCarthy, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia. Beltran & Bills, Frank J. Beltran, Ralph Perales, for Gardner.

Reinstated.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 S.E.2d 897, 266 Ga. 230, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 514, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gardner-ga-1996.