In re Gara
Opinion
It may be that the debt due to the objecting creditor was created by the misconduct of the bankrupt while acting in a fiduciary capacity. Assuming this to be true, section 17 protects the debt from discharge, but the mere existence of such a debt,does not prevent the bankrupt from receiving a discharge from his other provable obligations. The only obstacles to a discharge are described in section 14, and I do not find among them the creation of a debt by-the bankrupt’s fraud or other misconduct while acting in a fiduciary capacity. At the best, the pending specification charges such Creation and nothing more, and this is plainly insufficient.
The motion to dismiss is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
190 F. 112 (In re Gara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.