In re: Gantt
This text of In re: Gantt (In re: Gantt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 01-APR-2025 08:08 AM Dkt. 15 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
IN RE PAUL H. GANTT, Petitioner
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (Civil No. 5CC131000166)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ.; Circuit Judge Remigio, in place of Ginoza, J., recused, and Circuit Judge Morikone, in place of Devens, J., recused)
On January 28, 2025, Petitioner submitted a letter which
was filed as a petition for writ of mandamus. We are not
persuaded that the petition has established a clear and
indisputable right to the relief requested, nor a lack of
alternative means to seek the relief requested. See Womble Bond
Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154,
1166 (2023) (providing that a petition for mandamus relief must
establish a clear and indisputable right to the relief requested and a lack of other means to redress adequately the alleged
wrong or to obtain the requested action.).
The petition is denied. The clerk of the appellate court
shall process the petition without payment of the filing fee.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 1, 2025.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Catherine H. Remigio
/s/ Kevin T. Morikone
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Gantt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gantt-haw-2025.