In re Galligan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Galligan

254 A.D. 880, 5 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8137

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 880 (In re Galligan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Galligan, 254 A.D. 880, 5 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding instituted by John Galligan, heir at law and next of kin of the decedent, Edward Boche, here appellant, to procure an order, in pursuance of Surrogate’s Court Act, section 20, subdivision 6, opening, vacating, modifying and setting aside the decree, dated December 3, 1931, admitting the will of the deceased to probate, as far as that decree affects or purports to affect the rights of petitioner, and permitting him to file objections to the probate of the alleged last will and testament, final decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens county, denying petitioner’s application, unanimously affirmed, in so far as an appeal therefrom is taken, with costs to the executors and trustees, respondents, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Present — ■ Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding instituted by John Galligan, heir at law and next of kin of the decedent, Edward Boche, here appellant, to procure an order, in pursuance of Surrogate’s Court Act, section 20, subdivision 6, opening, vacating, modifying and setting aside the decree, dated December 3, 1931, admitting the will of the deceased to probate, as far as that decree affects or purports to affect the rights of petitioner, and permitting him to file objections to the probate of the alleged last will and testament, final decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens county, denying petitioner’s application, unanimously affirmed, in so far as an appeal therefrom is taken, with costs to the executors and trustees, respondents, payable out of the estate. No opinion. Present — ■ Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 880, 5 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-galligan-nyappdiv-1938.