In re Galerston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Galerston

253 A.D. 640, 3 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8517

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 640 (In re Galerston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Galerston, 253 A.D. 640, 3 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent was convicted in the Court of Special Sessions of the crime of soliciting retainers in an accident case, one justice dissenting. The conviction was affirmed in this court by a unanimous decision and in the Court of Appeals by a four to three decision. (People v. Galerston, 251 App. Div. 707; 276 N. Y. 656.) In view of the fact that respondent received a suspended sentence, and, giving due consideration to the other circumstances present in this case, it is the judgment of this court that the respondent be suspended for only one year, with leave to apply for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent suspended for one year.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent was convicted in the Court of Special Sessions of the crime of soliciting retainers in an accident case, one justice dissenting. The conviction was affirmed in this court by a unanimous decision and in the Court of Appeals by a four to three decision. (People v. Galerston, 251 App. Div. 707; 276 N. Y. 656.) In view of the fact that respondent received a suspended sentence, and, giving due consideration to the other circumstances present in this case, it is the judgment of this court that the respondent be suspended for only one year, with leave to apply for reinstatement at the expiration of that term upon proof of his compliance with the conditions incorporated in the order.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent suspended for one year.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 640, 3 N.Y.S.2d 759, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-galerston-nyappdiv-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack