In re Gaines

309 S.E.2d 5, 279 S.C. 531, 1983 S.C. App. LEXIS 67
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 8, 1983·No. 22001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a grievance proceeding charging John A. Gaines with neglect of a legal matter entrusted to him in violation of DR6-101(A)(3) and with handling a legal matter without preparation adequate in the circumstances in violation of DR6-101(A)(2). The Hearing Panel and Executive Committee have concurred in finding violations as charged in both instances. Public reprimand has been recommended by the Panel and the Committee.

[532] Although the Court is not in complete agreement as to the precise sanction appropriate in this case, we do find that public reprimand at a minimum is warranted. Respondent neglected on the one hand to timely accomplish necessary tasks and failed on the other hand to adequately prepare for representation of his clients. Such conduct demonstrates an intolerable degree of ineptitude and indifference. Accordingly, attorney John A. Gaines stands publicly reprimanded by this Court in accordance with Rule 7 A(3) of the Supreme Court Rules on Disciplinary Procedure.

Harwell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Gaines, 309 S.E.2d 5, 279 S.C. 531, 1983 S.C. App. LEXIS 67 (S.C. 1983).

309 S.E.2d 5 (In re Gaines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Gaines
559 S.E.2d 577 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)
Spann v. Martin
963 F.2d 663 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)