In re Gafni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Gafni

211 A.D.2d 364, 628 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6620

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 211 A.D.2d 364 (In re Gafni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gafni, 211 A.D.2d 364, 628 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law at the First Judicial Department in 1984, and has maintained an office for such practice within this Department at all relevant times since then. The subject of multiple charges of unethical practices and professional misconduct between 1989 and 1994, he now seeks to resign from the Bar. The charges include failure to preserve client funds, neglect of client matters, misrepresentation to clients of the true status of their cases, failure to return unearned legal fees, the making of false and misleading representations to clients, aiding the unauthorized practice of law, sharing legal fees with a nonlawyer, and failure to satisfy a judgment against him. Details of the misconduct and unethical practices are omitted from this opinion for good cause shown.

Respondent’s sworn submission satisfies the criteria of Rules of this Court (22 NYCRR) § 603.11, namely, that he is aware of petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s pending investigation and is unable to defend himself on the merits against the charges of misconduct and unethical practices, that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered without coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of this intentional act of resignation. Petitioner has recommended our acceptance of respondent’s resignation.

Accordingly,-respondent’s resignation is accepted and his name is ordered stricken from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice law in this State, effective immediately.

Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ., concur.

Motion granted, resignation of respondent accepted, and respondent’s name directed to be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law at the First Judicial Department in 1984, and has maintained an office for such practice within this Department at all relevant times since then. The subject of multiple charges of unethical practices and professional misconduct between 1989 and 1994, he now seeks to resign from the Bar. The charges include failure to preserve client funds, neglect of client matters, misrepresentation to clients of the true status of their cases, failure to return unearned legal fees, the making of false and misleading representations to clients, aiding the unauthorized practice of law, sharing legal fees with a nonlawyer, and failure to satisfy a judgment against him. Details of the misconduct and unethical practices are omitted from this opinion for good cause shown.

Respondent’s sworn submission satisfies the criteria of Rules of this Court (22 NYCRR) § 603.11, namely, that he is aware of petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s pending investigation and is unable to defend himself on the merits against the charges of misconduct and unethical practices, that his resignation is freely and voluntarily tendered without coercion or duress, and that he is fully aware of the implications of this intentional act of resignation. Petitioner has recommended our acceptance of respondent’s resignation.

Accordingly,-respondent’s resignation is accepted and his name is ordered stricken from the roll of attorneys authorized to practice law in this State, effective immediately.

Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Asch, JJ., concur.

Motion granted, resignation of respondent accepted, and respondent’s name directed to be stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.D.2d 364, 628 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gafni-nyappdiv-1995.