In re G.A.
This text of 2013 Ohio 17 (In re G.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re G.A., 2013-Ohio-17.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
WARREN COUNTY
IN THE MATTER OF: :
G.A. & M.A. : CASE NO. CA2012-10-100
: DECISION 1/7/2013 :
:
APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case No. 11-D000649
David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, 500 Justice Drive, Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for appellee, state of Ohio
Jeffrey E. Richards, 147 Miami Street, P.O. Box 536, Waynesville, Ohio 45068, for appellant, G.A.
Andrea Ostrowski, 25 East Central Avenue, Suite 4, Springboro, 45066, guardian ad litem
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of
the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the
Warren County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, and upon a brief filed by
appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived. Butler CA2012-10-100
{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, G.A., has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of
the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial
to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one
potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3)
requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the
proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's
constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the
basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and
motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having
been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant
requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that
it is wholly frivolous.
RINGLAND, P.J., S. POWELL and PIPER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ohio 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ga-ohioctapp-2013.