In re G.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re G.

130 A. 534, 3 N.J. Misc. 941, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112

DecidedSeptember 28, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A. 534 (In re G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re G., 130 A. 534, 3 N.J. Misc. 941, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112 (N.J. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the court:

The facts in this ease as stated orally and not by way of affidavit or in any formal way seem to be that this student failed at the examination last spring, and, consequently, under rule 6-C, he was required to serve a period of apprenticeship in the office of a counselor-at-law until the next examination. Instead of doing this, he seems to have gone to a law school and taken part of a course at that institution over the prescribed period, and wishes this to be counted in lieu of his service in a law office.

In this and in any other "cases of similar character, our ruling is that the rule specifically required service in a law office, and that it should he considered as meaning what it says; consequently, the application must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the court:

The facts in this ease as stated orally and not by way of affidavit or in any formal way seem to be that this student failed at the examination last spring, and, consequently, under rule 6-C, he was required to serve a period of apprenticeship in the office of a counselor-at-law until the next examination. Instead of doing this, he seems to have gone to a law school and taken part of a course at that institution over the prescribed period, and wishes this to be counted in lieu of his service in a law office.

In this and in any other "cases of similar character, our ruling is that the rule specifically required service in a law office, and that it should he considered as meaning what it says; consequently, the application must be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A. 534, 3 N.J. Misc. 941, 1925 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-g-nj-1925.