In re G. & E. Children

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re G. & E. Children

183 A.D.2d 490

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 12, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 183 A.D.2d 490 (In re G. & E. Children) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re G. & E. Children, 183 A.D.2d 490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Fact-finding and dispositional orders, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), dated March 13, 1990 and October 9, 1990, respectively, which found that respondent-appellant had sexually abused his daughter and had neglected both his daughter and his step-son, released the subject children to the respondent mother, under the supervision of the Child Welfare Administration, and directed respondent-appellant to attend sexual abuse counseling, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The daughter’s out-of-court statements that she had been sexually abused by her father have ample corroboration in the record as a whole, including the testimony of the responding police officer, the independent statements of the step-son that the girl had been abused (see, Matter of Nicole V., 71 NY2d 112, 124), and the testimony of the counseling psychologist that the daughter was exhibiting the classic symptoms of child abuse syndrome (see, supra, at 120-121).

We have considered appellant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. R, Rosenberger, Ross, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Fact-finding and dispositional orders, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), dated March 13, 1990 and October 9, 1990, respectively, which found that respondent-appellant had sexually abused his daughter and had neglected both his daughter and his step-son, released the subject children to the respondent mother, under the supervision of the Child Welfare Administration, and directed respondent-appellant to attend sexual abuse counseling, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The daughter’s out-of-court statements that she had been sexually abused by her father have ample corroboration in the record as a whole, including the testimony of the responding police officer, the independent statements of the step-son that the girl had been abused (see, Matter of Nicole V., 71 NY2d 112, 124), and the testimony of the counseling psychologist that the daughter was exhibiting the classic symptoms of child abuse syndrome (see, supra, at 120-121).

We have considered appellant’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur — Sullivan, J. R, Rosenberger, Ross, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 A.D.2d 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-g-e-children-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack