In re Futterweit

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Futterweit

89 A.3d 582, 217 N.J. 362, 2014 WL 2047971, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 471

DecidedMay 16, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.3d 582 (In re Futterweit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Futterweit, 89 A.3d 582, 217 N.J. 362, 2014 WL 2047971, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 471 (N.J. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-280, concluding that MARC A. FUTTER-WEIT of DOVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(b) (failure to memorialize the basis or rate of the legal fee) and RPC 1.8(a) (conflict of interest; business transaction with a client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARC A. FUTTERWEIT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[363]*363ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-280, concluding that MARC A. FUTTER-WEIT of DOVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(b) (failure to memorialize the basis or rate of the legal fee) and RPC 1.8(a) (conflict of interest; business transaction with a client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARC A. FUTTERWEIT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[363]*363ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.3d 582, 217 N.J. 362, 2014 WL 2047971, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-futterweit-nj-2014.